- Home
- Guide to This Website
- Take Action for Human Rights
- Disabled
- GHB - Xyrem
- Human Rights
- Human Persons vs Corporations
- Law Enforcement
- Legal
- Mental Health Rights
- Medical Fraud
- PTSD
- Psychiatric Rights
- Residental Treatment Abuse
- Sexual Assault
- Whistleblowers
- Native American
- Women's Rights
- Aertoxic Syndrome
- Food & Drug Administration - Off Label
- The Emperor's New Clothes
- NAFTA Foreign Investor Privileges
- MWAN UN Reports
- Supreme Court Decision - Citizens United
- Do You Know What a Dragon Looks Like?
- Mass Murder and Psychiatric Drugs
- Patients not Consumers
- La Experimentación no Consensual Spanish
- Medical Deferred Action Immigration Cases
- Voting Rights for Residents of the District of Columbia
- Benefits Trafficking
“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 1
Visitors
2677372
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke 1729 - 1797, Irish orator, philosopher, & politician
Financial Support by Charitable Choice Preferentially Given to Political Ally Chuck Colson
Charles "Chuck" Wendell Colson is a Christian leader, cultural commentator, and former Special Counsel for President Richard Nixon from 1969 to 1973. Chuck Colson was named as one of the Watergate Seven and pled guilty to obstruction of justice for attempting to defame Pentagon Papers defendant Daniel Ellsberg. Charles “Chuck” Colson was known as a man valuable to President Nixon because he was willing to be ruthless in getting things done according to David Plotz in a Slate March 10, 2000 article called " Charles Colson - How a Watergate crook became America's greatest Christian conservative"
On March 1, 1974, former aides to the president, known as the "Watergate Seven" — Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell, Charles Colson, Gordon C. Strachan, Robert Mardian and Kenneth Parkinson — were indicted for conspiring to hinder the Watergate investigation. The grand jury also secretly named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator. John Dean, Jeb Stuart Magruder, and other figures had already pleaded guilty. On April 5, 1974, former Nixon appointments secretary Dwight Chapin was convicted of lying to the grand jury. Two days later, the Watergate grand jury indicted Ed Reinecke, Republican lieutenant governor of California, on three charges of perjury before the Senate committee.
Nixon's position was becoming increasingly precarious, and the House of Representatives began formal investigations into the possible impeachment of the president. The House Judiciary Committee voted 27 to 11 on July 27, 1974 to recommend the first article of impeachment against the president: obstruction of justice. The second (abuse of power) and third (contempt of Congress) articles were passed on July 29, 1974 and July 30, 1974, respectively.
Chuck Colson was known as Nixon's "hatchet man". Colson was described by
some of his colleagues as "evil genius" in the Nixon administration.
Many can still remember that it was Chuck Colson who was willing to
resort to domestic terrorism and who discussed possible firebombing the
Brookings Institution. In 1974, Attorney Chuck Colson entered a plea of
guilty to Watergate-related charges. Colson was the first member of the
Nixon administration to be incarcerated for Watergate-related charges.
Chuck Colson plead guilty to obstruction of justice in the Daniel
Ellsberg case. Although he was given a one-to-three year sentence,
Colson only served seven months at Alabama's Maxwell Prison. Colson was
then a convicted felon with no right to vote but he received a pardon
from Florida Governor Jeb Bush so he could again vote, once again
practice law or serve on a jury. These were rights Colson had lost when
he became a convicted felon. Charles Colson was converted to a
born-again Christian while in prison. President George W. Bush was
supporting his “faith-based” prison fellowship ministries program and
promoting it in the Texas penal system.
Watergate-convict-turned-Christian evangelist converted to Christianity
in 1973. Chuck Colson had a Jails for Jesus solution which was touted as
a cheap fundamentalist Christian alternative to clinical programs for
prisoners. Colson began working with a non-profit organization devoted
to prison ministry which was called the Prison Fellowship. Through a
radio broadcast called BreakPoint Colson promoted this prison program.
Upon being released from prison, Chuck Colson's Innerchange worked with
the new Faith-based and Community Initiatives program. These programs
already exist in Iowa, Minnesota, Kansas and Texas.
http://www.nptimes.com/Feb02/npt2.html
“Ethics” is derived from the Greek term ethos, which refers to character and conduct.”
"Because of the diverse conditions of humans, it
happens that some acts are virtuous to some people, as appropriate and
suitable to them, while the same acts are immoral for others, as
inappropriate to them.
"
Thomas Aquinas
Freedom of Religion - The First Amendment
Prior to the George W. Bush administration, social welfare programs were administered through mainline religious denominations and their agencies, such as Catholic Charities and Lutheran Social Services. These agencies were scrupulous about avoiding religious discrimination in hiring or the clients they served – they also maintained a bright line that kept federal funding separate from church related financial funds. Bush White House officials re-directed social welfare funds to local religious congregations and inexperienced faith based agencies, many of which were unconcerned about inclusive policies and ill-equipped to respond to the problems people faced.
Freedom of Religion and Belief is a Fundamental Human Right
Freedom of religion is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community, in public or private, to manifest religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance; the concept is generally recognized also to include the freedom to change religion or not to follow any religion. The freedom to leave or discontinue membership in a religion or religious group —in religious terms called "apostasy" —is also a fundamental part of religious freedom. Freedom of religion is considered by many people and nations to be a fundamental human right. It is enshrined in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Freedom of religion and belief is a fundamental human right protected by a number of international treaties and declarations, including article 18(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This right encompasses freedom of thought on all matters and the freedom to manifest religion and belief individually or with others, in public or in private.
The right to freedom of religion is supported by the right to non-discrimination on the grounds of religion, contained in article 26 of the ICCPR.
International human rights law also protects people against the promotion of religious hatred which amounts to incitement of discrimination, hostility or violence (ICCPR, article 20).
Top Ten Largest Religious Bodies in the United States
Rank |
Religious Body |
Year |
Membership |
1 |
Catholic Church |
2002 |
66,407,105 |
2 |
Southern Baptist Convention |
2003 |
16,400,000 |
3 |
United Methodist Church |
2002 |
8,251,042 |
4 |
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints |
2004 |
5,599,177 |
5 |
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America |
2003 |
4,984,925 |
6 |
Church of God in Christ |
1991 |
4,500,000 |
7 |
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) |
2001 |
3,595,259 |
8 |
National Baptist Convention of America |
1987 |
3,500,000 |
9 |
Assemblies of God |
2002 |
2,687,366 |
10 |
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod |
2003 |
2,512,714 |
Of the approximate 2 billion Christians in the world today, 648 million (11% of the world's population) are Evangelicals or Bible believing Christians. Evangelicals have grown from only 3 million in AD 1500, to 648 million worldwide, with 54% being Non-Whites. Today in America, about 75% of adults identify themselves as Christian. In comparison, the next largest religions in America are Islam and Judaism. Combined they represent only about one to two percent of the United States population. However, there are more than 1500 different Christian faith groups in America. There are 224,457,000 (85%) of the US population are Christian.he
The Roman Catholic Church denomination is the largest Christian
group in the world today with more than a billion followers constituting about
half of the world's Christian population. Approximately 225 million
people worldwide are Orthodox Christians. There are approximately 500
million Protestants in the world.
About 12.6% of the US population is Fundamentalist Christian. Fundamentalist Christian groups do not agree with the restrictions placed on religious proselytization by the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Teen Challenge is run by the Assemblies of God Church and maintains prison chaplains as well as in prison programs. Teen Challenge is a Fundamentalist Christian organization.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution:
Freedom of Religion
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Thomas Jefferson said (1807) "among the inestimable of our blessings, also, is that ...of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; ..."
Showing respect for and honoring the First Amendment of the United States Constitution entails:
Government agencies and federally funded organizations may not advance any religion or religious philosophy over any other religion or religious philosophy.
No person may be compelled in any way to conform to a particular religion or religious philosophy.
No person may be compelled in any way to witness or engage in any religious exercise.
No person may be compelled to curtail the free exercise of their religious practices or beliefs.
All are entitled to the same Constitutional rights pertaining to religious freedoms and the free exercise of those freedoms.
No person may be compelled to endure unwanted religious proselytization, evangelization or persuasion in a federally funded program or agency.
The full exercise of religious freedom includes the right not to subscribe to any particular religion or religious philosophy. The so-called “unchurched” cede no Constitutional rights by want of their separation from organized faith.
It is responsibility of those that administer federally funded services to ensure that the free exercise of religious freedoms of all are respected and served.
All have the right to employ appropriate judicial means to protect their religious rights.
"How is it they live in such harmony the billions of stars – when most men can barely go a minute without declaring war in their minds about someone they know."
St. Thomas Aquinas
"It was not by accident or coincidence that the rights to
freedom in speech and press were coupled in a single guaranty
with the rights of the people peaceably to assemble and
to petition for redress of grievances. All these, though
not identical, are inseparable.
They are cognate rights, and therefore
are united in the first Article's assurance."
Judge Wiley B. Rutledge
[Wiley Blount Rutledge] U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Source: Thomas v. Collins, 1944
"And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
George Washington 1732-1799, the first President of the United States in his 'Farewell Address' (1796)
InnerChange Freedom Initiative IFI
InnerChange Freedom Initiative (IFI) is a
publicly supported, pervasively religious program that was established
in Texas, Minnesota, Kansas and Iowa. The contractual and monetary
relationship between Prison Fellowship, InnerChange, and the Department
of Corrections(DOC) developed over a number of years. The Texas
Department of Criminal Justice support from the 77th Texas Legislature
of $1.5 million (FY 2002-2003) was the first allocation of state funds
given to the InnerChange program. Since the initial IFI program began
in Texas, IFI has started two additional prison programs in the United
States. In October of 1999, a second program was opened in Iowa, which
has the potential to serve 192 inmates. In January 2000, the third IFI
program began operation in Kansas with a capacity of 158
inmates. But constitutional questions regarding separation of church
and state were raised at the level of the Eighth Circuit US Court of
Appeals. In March 2008 the InnerChange Fellowship Initiative in the
Iowa prison system was terminated by the State of Iowa.
The InnerChange
program in Iowa’s Newton Correctional Facility was a program where
inmates participated in "24-hour per day Christ-centered Bible-based
programming" conducted by IFI employees, and were required by policy
to be Christian. In 1997, the new Newton facility faced budgetary
restraints, overcrowding, and lack of appropriate programs. In 1998,
Iowa’s General Services Department publicly issued a request
for proposals to establish a non-compensated, values-based,
pre-release program at Newton. Prison Fellowship and InnerChange,
jointly, submitted the only proposal but they sought public state
funding to pay part of the expenses of the program.
The Department
of Corrections in March 1999 did contract with Prison Fellowship and
InnerChange for program services (September 1999 to June 2002),
with public tax payer money going for reimbursement for non-religious
costs and expenses. Prisoners in IFI were housed in a separate prison
unit. In the first year of the contract, the DOC paid InnerChange
$229,950, with all the money coming from the Inmate Telephone Rebate
Fund which is designated for discretionary use for the benefit of
inmates. The second year InnerChange received from the Department of
Corrections $191,625 from the same fund. In 2002, the General Services
Department accepted the InnerChange proposal for a pre-release program
at Newton under a renewable one year contract from July 2002 to June
2005 which was to provide state funding only for the non-religious
parts of the program. The DOC paid InnerChange $191,625 from the
Telephone Rebate Fund. The Iowa legislature appropriated $172,591 from
the Healthy Iowans Tobacco Trust to the DOC “for a values-based
treatment program at the Newton correctional facility.” This
appropriation was used to expand the InnerChange program to the Release
Center at Newton (a minimum-security facility one mile from the main
facility). The payment from the Trust to the DOC for InnerChange was
$276,909. In the third year, 2004 to 2005, the contract was changed to a
per diem payment of $3.47 for each inmate participating in
the program. The legislature again appropriated $310,000, with
actual payment to InnerChange of $236,532.55.
In 2005 the DOC
accepted InnerChange’s proposal for a pre-release substance abuse
treatment program. In the contract’s first and second years, July 2005
to June 2007, the Iowa legislature appropriated $310,000 each year. But
there never was a clear distinction in the billing to the taxpayers
regarding religious and non-religious expenditures. Until July 2007,
the DOC’s funding accounted for 30 to 40 percent of InnerChange’s
operating costs.
There were
concerns from even the first 1999 contract whether there was a clear
definition of what was religious and what was not. Salaries
and benefits for InnerChange’s personnel were paid by the DOC on
a percentage basis. The state paid 82% of the Local Director’s salary;
9% for the Program Manager; 93% for the Aftercare Manager; 77% for
the Office Administrator; and 16% for each of four Biblical Counselors
(also called Case Workers). All land and cell phone costs were billed
to the DOC. InnerChange’s postal meter and thermal tape were billed to
the state without detailed accounting. The DOC paid for
InnerChange’s computer hardware, software, repair, and internet
account. The DOC also paid for InnerChange’s letterhead, envelopes,
printer and copier toner, paper, blank videotapes, and standard office
supplies. Each month, every photocopy up to 40,000 was charged to the
DOC. Copies over 40,000 were designated as religious (although the
record does not reflect how many total copies were made each
month). Building M – a modular building housing InnerChange’s offices
and classrooms – was constructed in 2000. By the lease-purchase
contract, the Telephone Fund paid $294,017 for Building M. When the
DOC reimbursed InnerChange for costs or paid the per diem amount, the
money was deposited in InnerChange’s bank account. From that account,
InnerChange periodically transferred funds to Prison Fellowship’s
general accounts, to cover program operating expenses. These general
accounts also contain funds from private sources. This mixing of
public tax payer money with private funds (non-profit charities) makes
it difficult if not impossible to ascertain that the money was used for
secular purposes only and not for exclusively religious purposes. In
addition some of the charity funds these monies were mixed with had
been potentially implicated in certain kinds of affinity fraud and
other types of fraud. Money was moved around from account to account
with little accounting transparency to the state government as to who
actually got the money eventually. In addition the portion of
InnerChange expenses which was paid by the Prison Fellowship came from
these co-mingled funds with other NGO charities.
A law suit was
filed against the Prison Fellowship Ministries at the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the case of Americans United for the
Separation of Church and State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries. On
June 2, 2006, the district court held that the IFI program violated the
Establishment Clause, expelled the program from the prison, and
directed IFI to repay the Department of Corrections the $1.5 million
that it had been paid by the State. Defendants appealed to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in June 2006. Senior Litigation
Counsel Alex J. Luchenitser argued the appeal in February 2007 before a
panel that included former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day
O’Connor. In December 2007, the Eighth Circuit largely upheld the
district court’s decision. The court held that Iowa’s involvement with
IFI violated the Establishment Clause by supporting the indoctrination
of inmates and IFI’s discrimination against non-Christian inmates.
Ronald A.
Lindsay, Esq. of the COUNCIL FOR SECULAR HUMANISM and CENTER FOR
INQUIRY stated in their brief "No court has ever
endorsed government-funded religious indoctrination, and, as
indicated, InnerChange was well aware that their government-funded
activities very likely violated the Establishment Clause. Nonetheless,
in their zeal to spread their religious message, InnerChange and PFM
made a calculated decision to disregard the restrictions of the
Establishment Clause in implementing their program. To state that
freedom of conscience is a core value under the Constitution would be
an understatement. Religious liberty is one of our fundamental
freedoms, and it cannot be denied that it advances public policy to
preserve religious liberty and to prevent the government from allowing
its resources to be used for religious indoctrination. InnerChange and
the Iowa DOC deliberately have refused to adhere to recognized limits
on government funding of sectarian activity. Furthermore, their blatant
disregard for constitutional limits on funding of activities of
religious organizations is confirmed not only by the negligible,
inadequate effort made to limit funding to secular activities, but by
the design of the program itself." Judge Robert Pratt of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa agreed with the
plaintiff, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State,
that the faith-based prison program is unconstitutional and ordered the
program shut down. Americans United had won the case at the district
level and on appeal.
Kristine Holmgren, formerly a Presbyterian chaplain at Minnesota Correctional Facility-Shakopee, says she was fired in 2006 after she told her superiors that she had concerns about the InnerChange program. Holmgren charged that the program, which is sponsored by Charles W. Colson’s Prison Fellowship, amounted to “establishment and preferential treatment of a religious group over other religious groups.” Holmgren also said that the prisons’ programs lacked religious diversity and were mainly evangelical Christian in character. Holmgren had complained that the program “engaged in humiliation tactics – they were offensive, they singled out minorities and unmarried women, harassed lesbians and praised the superiority of men.” But although she won her case and will receive a cash settlement of $250,000, but the program she criticized – the InnerChange Freedom Initiative – will continue to operate at prisons in Minnesota but will not be publicly funded. A prison in Lino Lakes had received some tax funding for InnerChange but that funding was discontinued in 2007. This is not a Christian-Jewish issue, and it's also not a political spectrum, left or right issue, it's a Constitutional right and wrong issue.
http://www.au.org/media/church-and-state/archives/2011/04/ex-prison-chaplain-in-minn.html
Although the
Prison Fellowship InnerChange claims the program reduces recidivism.
Some point to a study that compared “graduates” of the InnerChange
program with nonparticipants. One cannot be a graduate of InnerChange
unless one remains in the program following release from prison,
obtains a job, and avoids being reimprisoned for at least
six consecutive months. The cited study does not focus on the
numerous participants who never graduated. If one looks at all the
InnerChange program participants (both graduates and nongraduates),
then the “InnerChange participants did somewhat worse than the
controls: They were slightly more likely to be rearrested and
noticeably more likely (24 percent versus 20 percent) to be
reimprisoned.” Mark A. R. Kleinman, Faith-Based Fudging:How a
Bush-Promoted Christian Prison Program Fakes Success by Massaging Data,
Slate (Aug. 5, 2003), available at: http://www.slate.com/id/2086617.
Prison
Fellowship works through Teen Challenge to provide housing and jobs for
recently released prisoners. There are co-mingled funds between these
programs. In addition Teen Challenge gets TNAF federal food assistance
and also re-entry prisoners get federal funds which support their
employment at Teen Challenge. Re-entry prisoners paychecks are handed
over to the Teen Challenge staff as well as all state
food assistance. In addition a mandatory church tithe is extracted as
well as rent from the ex-prisoners federally subsidized
paycheck. Historically some Teen Challenge facilities have up to 80%
of their funding from federal sources like TNAF. Thus the amount of
real non-federal or state sources money that goes into a program like
Teen Challenge's Prison Fellowship aftercare program or IFI is
difficult to compute due to the lack of accounting procedures to
identify and properly source funds.
"Price is what you pay. Value is what you get."
Warren Buffett 1930-, American Investment Entrepreneur
"Earnings can be pliable as putty when a charlatan heads the company reporting them."
Warren Buffett 1930-, American Investment Entrepreneur
Teen Challenge hires ex-cons
As you will see below when examining the TNAF Teen Challenge food stamp
fraud, the Frank Vennes Minnesota Teen Challenge Ponzi Fraud Scheme and
the affinity fraud of Southwestern Indian Foundation that criminal
corruption can co-exist inside religious charity non-profits. Teen
Challenge in Arizona is associated with a in prison Teen Challenge
recruitment program as well as court ordered placement at Teen Challenge
in Phoenix AZ. The Don Stewart Association (DSA), a Phoenix-based
televangelism ministry , and its affiliated 22 charities (including
Southwest Indian Foundation) were accused of performing controversial
transactions with supplies that helped inflate their finances. The DSA
affiliated charities transferred ownership of goods to other groups
including $80 million of goods that the charities never physically
handled.
Teen Challenge was already opening its’ doors to hire known criminals
(through a federally funded re-entry employment program) those who
converted to Christianity. Teen Challenge had many centers in Texas and
Florida. George W. Bush was governor of Texas January 17, 1995 –
December 21, 2000, and had promoted legislation and administrative
actions favorable to Teen Challenge and other evangelical Christian
based programs like InnerChange. In 1997 the Texas legislature passed a
bill allowing religious child care facilities to be accredited by a
private sector regulator, the Texas Association of Christian Child Care
Agencies (TACCCA). In 1997, Texas became the first state to use the
faith-based effort, run by Chuck Colson's Prison Fellowship Ministries –
InnerChange. Governor of Texas George Bush Texas provided funds for
the prison program - $1.5 million. The Roloff Homes were the first of
eight faith-based child-care facilities accredited by TACCCA. Despite
continued complaints of abuse and neglect, TACCCA re-accredited the
Roloff Homes in April 2000. Roloff Homes was finally shut down for
child abuse in Texas in 2001. Teen Challenge centers in Florida got
accredited by an alternative agency just like those in Texas - so they
too could avoid being regulated and inspected by state agencies.
The newly rapidly multiplying Teen Challenge facilities were therefore
staffed by former prisoners who were recruited by Assemblies of God/Teen
Challenge prison Chaplains. The Assemblies of God prison Chaplains
often have dual responsibilities and may be also paid prison staff with
fairly unlimited access to prisoners. With Teen Challenge staff paid
for out of re-entry prison federal funds, the Teen Challenge facilities
had low staff overhead. This financially beneficial arrangement
permitted the rapid expansion of the Teen Challenge ministries program.
This aggressive outreach of the Assemblies of God Teen Challenge
program was also fueled by start up grants which were made possible
through collaboration with the Faith-based and Community Initiative
grant program and other linked programs.
In addition Texas Governor George Bush had exempted Teen Challenge in
Texas from state regulation and inspection (following the state closing
of Roloff Homes for child abuse). The investigators from the Texas
state agencies (mandated to report human rights violations) were refused
entry to Texas Teen Challenge facilities. By placing Scott Bloch in
charge of reviewing all federal whistleblower complaints in 2001, the
avenue for those in federal service to report child abuse as mandated
reporters was essentially closed.
These public policy decisions opened the door for prisoners who
professed religious conviction to be hired by Teen Challenge for
positions working with children. Thus the arrangement of hiring
“Christian” prisoners who were in re-entry prison programs (InnerChange)
to work as staff, religious counselors and even directors of Teen
Challenge facilities. One such prisoner with a record of criminal
conviction of sexual child abuse was Shondi Fabiano, who was hired on
staff and co-Directed the Teen Challenge Men's facility in Maine. She
had previously been the head of the Teen Challenge Women's facility in
Rhode Island prior to her marriage to Peter Sabiano.
Prisoners are paroled from prison to faith-based outreach at Teen
Challenge where they received counseling, study the Bible and attend
church. These “Christian” criminals who had spent hard prison time had
many criminal associates and criminal connections and were not always
under the full control or adequate supervision of their parole officers.
Parole officers saw these “Christian” jail coverts as well-behaved
parolees as they were gainfully employed at the Teen Challenge
facilities. Teen Challenge as an employer would vouch for the employed
prisoners and make allowances for their non-compliant conduct in order
to keep them “on the path”. These criminals in their re-entry
employment at Teen Challenge were tasked to do missionary “outreach” to
teens on the streets of New England. Protected by their employer Teen
Challenge and poorly supervised by officials from the prison system,
these “Christian” employees openly did street “interventions”. But Teen
Challenge facilities had long been suspected of abusive practices and
the continuing stream of complaints were surfacing but not getting any
action by state or federal authorities.
"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."
John F. Kennedy
Medical vs Faith Based Model for Rehabilitation
Teen Challenge gained national attention in 1995 when the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse (TCADA) threatened to shut down Teen Challenge of South Texas because continuing allegations of abuse and fraud. Teen Challenge of South Texas continued to assert that its counselors refused to trade in their faith-based approach for a "medical model" based on the concept that alcoholism is a disease rather than a manifestation of sin. The state regulators were requiring that staff be properly trained and that the facilities be licensed and inspected. Teen Challenge in Texas and in Florida was unlicensed and unregulated and investigators and child protective services were trying to find a way to get some regulatory control over the residential teen rehabilitation industry especially in light of continuing complaints of abuse. The state was demanding licensing and inspection. Teen Challenge had opted for an alternative accreditation program that did no inspections and was based on a faith based model. State and federal regulators were trying to get regulatory and inspection control over Teen Challenge. Teen Challenge wanted no regulation at all.
Assemblies of God & Sex Offending Pastors
Ted Arthur
Haggard was the founder and former pastor of the New Life Church in Colorado
Springs, a founder of the Association of Life-Giving Churches, and was leader
of the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) from 2003 until November
2006. In November 2006, escort and
masseur Mike Jones alleged that Haggard had paid Jones to engage in sex with
him for three years and had also purchased and used crystal methamphetamine. A
few days later Haggard resigned from all of his leadership positions. After the
scandal was publicized, Haggard entered three weeks of intensive counseling,
overseen by four ministers. In February 2007, one of those ministers, Tim
Ralph, said that Haggard "is completely heterosexual." Ralph later
said he meant that therapy "gave Ted the tools to help to embrace his
heterosexual side." On June 1, 2010 Haggard announced that he intended to
start a new church in Colorado Springs. In February 2011, Haggard came out as
bisexual. A prepared statement by the
church November 4, 2006 "Our investigation and Pastor Haggard's public
statements have proven without a doubt that he has committed sexually immoral
conduct." His removal as pastor was deemed permanent. But in an effort to again be able, in spite of
the public scandal, to preach again, Haggard was treated by three weeks of
intensive counseling overseen by four ministers who proclaimed him “completely
heterosexual” in Feb. 2007. Then Haggard
and his wife signed up for classes at the University of Phoenix which offered
online degrees in counseling and psychology.
In order to get “restored” as a minister Haggard moved Phoenix, Arizona
in April 2007 attended Phoenix First Assembly of God, whose pastor, Tommy
Barnett. Pastor Barnette was on his
counseling team. Haggard reached an agreement with New Life Church on a
severance package that would pay him through 2007; one of the conditions was
that he had to leave the Colorado Springs area.
In August 2007, Haggard released a statement asking for monetary
donations could be sent to the Families with a Mission 501 c 3 organization to
help support him and his family. He then
planned to move into the Dream Center, a Phoenix-based halfway house that
ministers to recovering convicts, drug addicts, and prostitutes. Haggard was
pursuing a degree in counseling while his wife Gayle is studying psychology. Far from being destitute, Haggard in 2006
received $115,000 income and also $85,000 anniversary bonus shortly before the
scandal broke as well as $138,000 severance. Additionally, the Haggards have a
home in Colorado Springs, Colorado that is valued at more than $700,000. In addition Haggard still receives royalties
from books he has authored.
Additional Information:
- TIME Names the 25 Most Influential EVANGELICALS in America TIME
- Egan, Tim (9 November 2004). "State Of The Union: The Evangelical vote". BBC News. Retrieved 2006-10-18.
- Harris, Dan (November 3, 2006). "Evangelical Leader Denies Accusation of Paying Former Gay Prostitute for Sex". ABC News. Retrieved 2006-11-5.
- "Haggard Pronounced ‘Completely Heterosexual’". Associated Press. 2007-2-6. pp. 1. Retrieved 2007-2-6.
- "Ted Haggard starts new church". 850 KOA. Clear Channel Communications. 2010-6-3.
- "Ted Haggard Says He's Bisexual". CBS News. January 28, 2011.
- Castro, Anthony (2006-11-05). "Sex, drugs and election fallout". The Journal Gazette.
- Haggard, Ted: """The Life-Giving Church"" , page 27. Regal Books, 2001.
- "Two ORU Alumni Recognized in Time Piece". ORU Excellence Magazine. ORU Alumni Foundation. Spring 2005. Archived from the original on 2007-08-29. Retrieved 2011-02-22.
- Zoll, Rachel (2006-11-10). "Haggard scandal raises questions about 'superstar' pastors". Associated Press. Retrieved 2006-11-10.
- Harris, Dan (November 3, 2006). "Haggard Admits Buying Meth". ABC News. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
- "Accuser recounts trysts with 'Art'". Rocky Mountain News. November 3, 2006. Archived from the original on 2006-11-20. Retrieved 2006-11-03.
- "The resurrection of Pastor Ted," The Colorado Springs Independent, October 1, 2009, http://www.csindy.com/colorado/the-resurrection-of-pastor-ted/Content?oid=1450688
- "Confronting a Scandal," The Colorado Springs Gazette, November 3, 2006, http://www.gazette.com/articles/haggard-10876-church-jones.html
- McPhee, Mike (November 3, 2006). "Haggard's accuser fails lie detector". The Denver Post. Retrieved 2006-11-03.
- A look at the contradictions in the different statements Pastor Ted Haggard has made to 9NEWS. 9NEWS at 5 p.m. November 1, 2006.
- Haggard, Ted. "Sex, drug allegations could affect Haggard's writing career". Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-01-09.
- "Haggard steps down amid sex allegations". Rocky Mountain News. November 2, 2006. Archived from the original on 2006-11-07. Retrieved 2006-11-03.
- "Church Leader Says Haggard Admits To Some Indiscretions". KKTV. 2006-11-03. Retrieved 2006-11-03.
- McPhee, Mike; Eric Gorski (2006-12-06). "Haggard admits buying meth". Denver Post. Retrieved 2007-01-01.
- "Haggard admits 'sexual immorality', apologizes". MSNBC. 2006-11-05. Retrieved 2007-01-01.
- Cooperman, Alan (2006-11-04). "Minister Admits to Buying Drugs and Massage". Washington Post. Retrieved 2006-11-16.
- Church forces out Haggard for 'sexually immoral conduct' 2006-11-03
- How Ted Haggard Was Fired and Why: Minister’s Own Rules Sealed His Fate November 19, 2006
- Donovan, Kevin (November 15, 2006). "Focus on the Family VP Joins Haggard Restoration Team". 'The Christian Post. Retrieved 23 July 2009.
- Ted Haggard leaves Colorado for Phoenix, Colorado, USA: 9 News.
- "Disgraced minister Ted Haggard moving to Phoenix". Dallas Morning News.
- Ted Haggard Quits New Life 'Restoration Team', Colorado Confidential.
- Haggard appeals for financial help, Colorado Springs Gazette, August 25, 2007.
- Text of a letter from Haggard, undated (Word document), posted by KRDO (via worldnow.com)
***************************************************************************************
DALLAS - An 18-year-old man and his parents sued the Assemblies of God and the church's ranch for troubled youths, claiming the youth was molested by a counselor at the center two years ago. The alleged victim was 16 when he went to Dallas Teen Challenge Boys Ranch in January 1996. According to his lawsuit, a counselor and convicted drug trafficker sexually molested him on at least six different occasions. The lawsuit further alleges that the church ranch Executive Director Paul Ecker and the ranch's board knowingly employed men with criminal histories as counselors despite being informed by state regulators that the practice was illegal.
According to the lawsuit, most of
the residents were there as a condition of probation, and had psychological or
substance abuse problems. During the day, they performed chores, including
caring for livestock, and took part in religious education. At night, they were
"locked down" and monitored by alarm systems to prevent unauthorized
departures. Among the employees and volunteers working at the ranch were men in
a program called "Life Challenge," designed for adults. Many of them
had substance abuse problems and were improperly admitted to the program as
part of their probation, the lawsuit states. (5/13/98, AP)
Lawsuit claims church camp hired convict who molested boy
*****************************************************************************************************
REV. L.G. GILSTRAP, 54, an
Assemblies of God minister, was convicted by a jury on 3 counts of child
molestation and sentenced to 33 years in prison for a string of fondling
incidents in 1988 involving brothers aged 10 and 13. The older boy said
Gilstrap once tried to have sex with him in the shower. Eight men testified
during the trial that they too were molested by the minister when they were
boys. Three said they were also abused by the Sunday school teacher, who was
not tried. Gilstrap denied the charges but corroborated their accusations
against the teacher. The prosecutor called Gilstrap the " Pied Piper of pedophilia."
Gilstrap, defrocked, started a new church, New Hope Ministries. Married, he was
a former clerk for the Georgia House of Representatives. (Atlanta Constitution,
9/22/89)
Ex-Minister
Gets 33-Year Sentence In Child Sex Case: Gilstrap Guilty of 3 Molestation
Counts
"Lawyers, before any other group, must continue to point out how the system is really working--how it actually affects real people. They must constantly demonstrate to courts and legislatures alike the tragic results of legal nonintervention. They must highlight how legal doctrines no longer bear any relation to reality, whether in landlord and tenant law, holder in due course law, or any other law. In sum, lawyers must bring real morality into the legal consciousness"
Justice Wm. Brennan
Teen Challenge and Faith-based and Community Initiatives
Scott Bloch was appointed to the position of Special Counsel for the
Office of Special Counsel by President George W. Bush. This followed
Bloch’s appointment to the Task Force for Faith-Based and Community
Initiatives which funneled money to Teen Challenge. Teen Challenge was a
residential treatment program which claimed religious treatment for
addiction and life challenging problems. Based on strong Christian
principles, the intensive program takes residents come from the streets,
detoxification facilities, hospitals or jails. Some are referred by
pastors and counselors or court-ordered into treatment by judges. Teen
Challenge was operated by the Assemblies of God. Scores of pastors,
inner-city missionaries and evangelists have graduated from Teen
Challenge.
Scott Bloch served as Deputy Director of the DOJ Task Force for the
Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (OFBCI). Attorney Scott
Bloch, as a US Attorney, did not do due diligence in determining
whether it was appropriate to funnel funds to facilities that would be
housing vulnerable children and adults and who were also hiring staff at
those facilities who were ex-cons with known criminal convictions for
sexual abuse of children, drug dealing, domestic violence and money
laundering. Why? Perhaps it is because it was the wish of the new
President of the United States, George W. Bush (January 20, 2001 –
January 20, 2009), to provide an open field for Charles Colson’s
InnerChange Prison program and the expansion of Teen Challenge and the
ministries of the Assembly of God. Chuck Colson had just been pardoned
by Governor Jeb Bush and was moving once again in Republican campaign
circles.
What is Charitable Choice?
The "Charitable Choice" provision (section 104) of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (welfare
reform legislation) meant to privatize welfare requires states that
contract with nonprofit organizations for delivery of social services to
include religious organizations as eligible contractees. The goal of
Charitable Choice was to end the welfare system of entitlement money
that provides a safety net for the poor and needy and instead turn the
system into a privatized system where corporate and non-governmental
service agencies compete to provide services. Then when entering office,
President George W. Bush issued an executive order known as the
Faith-Based Initiative which created a bureaucracy with the sole purpose
of providing support to faith-based providers of social services.
Although in theory this might sound like a system to save money and be
economical with public funds, it ignores the basic reality of possible
fraud by corporate entities such as residential treatment facilities,
private prisons and pharmaceutical companies, and many others who
benefit by the decreased federal oversight and transparency.
Scott Bloch served as the Chief Counsel for the White House Office of
Faith-based and Community Initiatives from 2001-2003. In that position
he funneled grant money to Teen Challenge in spite of mounting evidence
of fraud, illegal activity and even sexual abuse of children in Teen
Challenge centers. This was a politically important program that would
be critical to President Bush’s and Karl Rove’s political strategy to
keep the right faithful to the Republican party and would help generate
income for Bush’s political campaign. Through the Faith-based and
Community Initiatives program political allies were financially rewarded
and other deserving NGO’s received little or nothing.
Political Motives Affect Public Policy Regarding Enforcement Child Protection in Texas
The Rebekah Home for Girls, founded in 1967, was run by Lester Roloff a
fundamentalist preacher. In his very successful radio show, the late
evangelist, Lester Roloff, praised the use of punitive "Bible
discipline" as a method to chasten girls who had fallen from grace.
Lester Roloff claimed that the Rebekah Home took in fallen girls from
"jail houses, broken homes, hippie hives, and dope dives" who were
"walking through the wilderness of sin." Roloff asserted that he remade
these girls into scripture-quoting, gospel-singing believers. As a
result the faithful showered Roloff Evangelistic Enterprises with
checks, jewelry and other valuables and he made millions. Texas State
welfare workers received reports of physical abuse and Attorney General
John Hill finally filed a suit against Roloff Evangelistic Enterprises.
After many lost court battles and faced with forced closure of the
Rebekah Girls Home hundreds of fundamental evangelical supporters
surrounded the Rebekah Home forming a human barricade to prevent the
state officials from closing in. The Rebekah girls were essentially
prisoners in this political show down between Roloff and the Texas
Attorney General. Lester Roloff was expressing his political power and
the hidden support network of thousands of fundamentalists who adhered
to similar beliefs and listened to his radio show. So the Roloff Homes
was the center of an epic, twelve-year battle between church and
state-culminating in a standoff that Roloff called the Christian
Alamo-in which the maverick preacher and his successors fought to avoid
regulation by the State of Texas. ( For a more personal account of
Roloff Homes see http://www.nospank.net/colloff.htm)
The political message was clear – there was a huge following of fervent
religious people not just in Texas but throughout the USA. These were
American citizens who had previously not engaged in the political arena,
many of whom had never even registered to vote and who in large part
lived their lives apart from the rest of the general society. They
claimed the right to religious freedom and do what they wished within
their religious facilities. They claimed Lester Roloff as one of their
own and he then embodied their right to separation of church and state.
The Texas Attorney General and the social services agencies who wished
to shut the facility down were representing the right of the state of
Texas to assure that human rights abuses and child abuse did not happen
to any minor child regardless of the religious beliefs of the parents.
Hundreds of Lester Roloff’s supporters massed around the Rebekah Home,
on Roloff's 557-acre compound south of Corpus Christi, linking arms and
forming a human barricade to prevent state officials from moving in.
This was a three day stand off between the state of Texas and the
religious right. Although Roloff agreed to close his youth homes and
send his Rebekah girls to youth homes out of the state, this was only a
brief victory for the welfare agencies trying to protect the children
from abuse. But the homes later reopened under the auspices of the
People's Baptist Church rather than Roloff Evangelistic Envangelical
Enterprises.
Because this "Christian Alamo" public rally became the place where,
George W. Bush, then governor of Texas, came to the rescue, promising to
push forward state legislation that exempted many faith-based social
programs from state interference. This gained Governor George W. Bush
political support from the religious right. The lure of the support of
countless thousands of currently unregistered voters passionate about
this issue swayed the political decision making of the Texas Governor
George W. Bush. The religious right embraced him as he claimed to
support Separation of Church and State as an issue and to exempt
religious facilities from state regulation and inspection.
The Christian Alamo event was a major victory for Roloff Homes, Teen
Challenge and other fundamentalist religious facilities and the start of
what became Mr. Bush's faith-based initiative. There is no question
that eliminating basic health and safety standards made operations
easier for a few faith-based programs in Texas, however it was also
clear that the lack of minimum standards has threatened the safety of
those participating in the programs and the ability of the state to
assure human rights protections to minor children. The overwhelming
majority of faith-based child-care facilities in Texas chose to remain
under state oversight; only 7 of 2,015 religious institutions elected tAfter the Christian Alamo at the Rebekah Home for girls, George W. Bush
politically backed Teen Challenge and other residential facilities run
by religious groups as it helped him with his political campaign to get
votes from the far right – especially the support of the fundamentalist
evangelicals and also the Catholic vote. The Alamo standoff was the
start of what was to become Mr. Bush's faith-based initiative. Teen
Challenge New England Director, Rodney Hart started with Bob Woodson of
the Washington, D.C.-based National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise,
who fought for Teen Challenge during the Texas controversy in 1995.
Rodney Hart also approached Jim Towey, head of the White House Office of
Faith-based and Community Initiatives under Bush (2002-2006) who worked
with Attorney Scott Bloch. and now President of Ave Maria University.
George W. Bush made providing food stamp money to Teen Challenge a
priority for his administration, so through the Charitable Choice
program and changes in the legislation for TNAF the federal government
was once again providing money to Teen Challenge without any pesky
regulation or inspection, to
operate under alternative accreditation.
"Cheshire Puss, asked Alice. Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? That depends a good deal on where you want to go, said the Cat. I don’t much care where, said Alice. Then it doesn’t matter which way you go, said the Cat."
Charles "Lewis Carroll" Dodgson 1832-1898, English writer and mathematician, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland 1865
The Federal Agency USDA in coordination with State Child Protection Agencies tries to shut down Teen Challenge
In Dallas Texas in 1998 two boys had filed they had been sexually
molested by a staff member who was a convicted drug trafficker. After
many reports of child abuse at Teen Centers nationwide, the Director of
Teen Challenge San Antonio, received a letter from TCADA stating that
the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) had determined that residents
of Teen Challenge centers in Texas are no longer eligible to receive
food stamps because the centers were not state licensed or inspected.
The San Antonio Teen Challenge center admitted that it depended on the
food stamps for nearly half its annual food budget. Teen Challenge on
the other hand claimed that federal food stamp regulations hindering
men and women who are working to overcome addictions at Teen Challenge
centers in four states. Reports kept surfacing that the food purchased
with the food stamps was being sold on the black market and children in
the Teen Challenge Centers fed nothing but water, white bread and peanut
butter.
In opposition to state regulation of Teen Challenge, Texas Governor
George W. Bush convened a fifteen-member advisory task force in 1995
made up largely of clergy and charged them with two objectives: to
identify state laws and regulations that hindered the work of
faith-based groups and to recommend ways to lift some of those
regulations. The task force was formed because of the ongoing battle
between the Texas Commission of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and a faith-based
drug-treatment center, Teen Challenge, in San Antonio.
The Rhode Island Women’s Program was being run by a registered sex
offender – Shondi Barbato and she was not the only sex offender on staff
at Teen Challenge. State regulators in several states wanted to stop
the direct access to children by registered sex offenders and violent
criminal offenders in the Teen Challenge program.
In most Teen
Challenge centers food stamp money provides a majority of their funding.
Those in child protective services were hopeful that this denial of
food stamps would finally put an end to the hiring of registered sex
offenders, drug dealers, violent criminals and other convicts to staff
Teen Challenge Centers and force them to be licensed, inspected and
regulated so that the safety of the children could be assured. In
several states, including Massachusetts and Vermont, officials halted
benefits to Teen Challenge clients because the programs were not
formally recognized by state officials, and because clients were turning
their Food Stamps over to administrators of the treatment program. The
coupons were pooled together to buy groceries for those who live in
dormitory-style housing for 18 months during their treatment. Thus
through the actions of the federal USDA, the federal authorities hoped
to protect the human rights and body integrity of children in the care
of Teen Challenge facilities.
The threatened cutoff of food stamps to Teen Challenge threatened to
shut down Teen Challenge centers in Oregon, Florida, and Massachusetts.
The Boston field Office for the USDA's Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
shut down food stamps to Teen Challenge New England. In Brockton MA in
2005 food stamps were provided roughly $150 for each man per month in
Brockton, Massachusetts. This food stamp support totaled nearly $200,000
a year. The USDA stated to Teen Challenge that "The basis for your
denial was that your program is not licensed by the state of
Massachusetts."
But there was strong protest from the Director Teen Challenge New
England, Rodney Hart who was the supervisor of Shondi Barbato, a
registered sex offender hired at Teen Challenge New England. Rodney
Hart, who is himself a 1976 graduate of Teen Challenge, advocated
politically for creating a separate category for faith-based groups on a
federal level which he said was the key to solving "a serious glitch
that needs to be fixed at a higher level." Teen Challenge New England’s
lawyer, Brad Martin filed a complaint against the government in 2005 on
behalf of Teen Challenge New England, which has centers in Connecticut,
Vermont, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. Stamped Out http://www.worldmag.com/articles/10969 World Magazine August 27, 2005, Vol. 20, No. 33
The Director of Teen Challenge New England, Rodney Hart, goes on to
state "The government does not have a lens to interpret faith-based
recovery centers," he says. "It only recognizes the disease model, which
is totally irrelevant to us." Mr. Hart adamantly refuses to obtain a
state license, saying it would mean "obtaining an identity that doesn't
correspond to who we are. . . . It would be like getting a deer-hunting
license to hunt crocodiles." Stamped Out http://www.worldmag.com/articles/10969 World Magazine August 27, 2005, Vol. 20, No. 33
"Texas Freedom Network, a 23,000-member non-partisan grassroots watchdog
group based in Austin conducted a five-year study of the policy and
found, “As exempt faith-based drug treatment centers, [such] facilities
are not required to have licensed chemical dependency counselors,
conduct staff training or criminal background checks, protect client
confidentiality rights, adhere to state health and safety standards, or
report abuse, neglect, emergencies and medication errors.” http://www.schaler.net/inthenews/washblade.html
With the influence of President George W. Bush the federal government
cleared the way for clients of the faith-based Teen Challenge drug and
alcohol recovery program to resume receiving Food Stamps.
“In a joint opinion issued by the Secretaries of the U.S. Departments of
Agriculture (USDA), and Health and Human Services (HHS), it has now
been determined that residents of such treatment programs are eligible
for Food Stamps, so long as the programs are operating in compliance
with provisions of the Public Health Services Act. Under the opinion,
state agencies which administer Food Stamps must recognize such programs
as "operating to further the purposes of Part B of Title XIX" of the
act -- however it also specifies that such programs are not required to
be licensed by states in order to be eligible.” http://www.ombwatch.org/
What does Rodney Hart have to hide from state regulators and inspectors?
Why does he refuse to cooperate with federal USDA inspectors and FBI
agents? According to his thesis Teen Challenge New England had in 2007
589 beds and revenue that was about $7 million. The staff of Teen
Challenge New England was 95% graduates of the program and there were
125 salaried staff. To learn more about the beliefs of Rodney Hart,
Director of Teen Challenge New England see his 185 page thesis - http://www.tcnewengland.org/resources/Rodney%20Hart%20Thesis%20-%20Full%20Version.pdf
"To see what is right and not to do it is want of courage."
Confucius 551 B.C. - 479 B.C.,
Chinese philosopher, The Analects, Book II, Chapter XXIV
Additional Information about Sexual Abuse at Teen Challenge:
http://www.topix.net/forum/city/minneapolis-mn/TN94VATH520HE9UQM/p10#lastPost
http://www.tfn.org/religiousfreedom/faithbased/teenchallenge/
http://www.texnews.com/1998/texas/molest0513.html
http://sportsforum.ws/the-tavern/t-the-official-post-all-your-stupid-religious-propaganda-shit-in-here-thread-153972.html
Additional Information on the Teen Challenge and Food Stamps:
Teen Challenge New England Intake Form
www.tcbrockton.org/resources/TCNE_intake_form.pdf
Government Teen Challenge Record on Food Stamps
www.ombwatch.org/node/5198
Food stamp fraud in Honolulu and elsewhere
www.the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2001/Jun/08/ln/ln09a.html
http://teenchallengecult.blogspot.com/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/05/04/504505/-Teen-Challenge:-Your-tax-dollars,-paying-for-institutionalised-abuse
Under Charitable Choice provisions TNAF provided extensive financial support to Teen Challenge.
CRS Report - Charitable Choice, Faith-Based Initiatives, and TANF Vee Burke, Domestic Social Policy Division http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5458/m1/1/high_res_d/RS20712_2003Sep30.pdf
Don Stewart Ministries and Charity Fraud
In May of 2009, The Arizona Republic reported on its yearlong investigation of activities between the Don Stewart Association (DSA), a Phoenix-based televangelism ministry , and its affiliated secular charities including Southwest Indian Foundation. Twenty two charities, including the Southwest Indian Foundation, had ties to the Don Stewart Association and were accused of performed controversial transactions with supplies that helped inflate their finances. With such lapses in financial accountability, it was difficult if not impossible to tell if the charity actually raised its own funds or even how much of the money actually was theirs. Charities in the network, such as Southwest Indian Foundation, had used up to 76 percent of their donated cash on salaries and other expenses and often gave cash to other charities in the same network. In non-profit organizations there are many connections between charitable organizations including shared board members and shared staff, personal ties and family connections. The Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) is the world's largest workplace charity campaign which allows federal employees and military personnel to donate a portion of their paychecks to charities of their choice. The 22 charities reported $154 million in total revenue over three years. About four-fifths of that was in the form of gifts in kind. The charities transferred ownership of goods to other groups including $80 million of goods that the charities never physically handled.
Southwest Indian Foundation 100 West Coal Avenue, Gallup, NM 87301
American Institute of Philanthropy Charity Rating Guide & Watchdog Report http://www.charitywatch.org/ratingguide.html American Institute of Philanthropy, P.O. Box 578460, Chicago, IL 60657 Phone: (773) 529-2300 Fax: (773) 529-0024 E-mail: www.charitywatch.org/
Joe Feuerherd "Catholic connections help pitch plan". National Catholic Reporter. FindArticles.com. 06 Apr, 2011. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_32_41/ai_n15933152/
Don Stewart: A life in pursuit of God's reward, The Arizona Republic / AZCentral.com by Robert Anglen, May 4, 2009 http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/05/04/20090504charities-stewart0504.html
Anglen, Robert (May. 3, 2009). "Network of charities". The Arizona Republic. http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/05/03/20090503charities0503network.html.
Anglen, Robert (May. 3, 2009). "Follow the cash: Charities spent bulk of it on salaries, expenses". The Arizona Republic. http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2009/05/04/20090504charities-day2-container.html.
"Attorney general reviewing charities' practices". KSWT-TV. May 10, 2009. http://www.kswt.com/Global/story.asp?S=10335560&nav=menu613_2_6.
Anglen, Robert (Sept. 27, 2009). "Feds look into group of charities". The Arizona Republic. http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/09/27/20090927charity0927.html
Finances, Fraud, and False Teaching in the Troubled History of Don Stewart by G. Richard Fisher http://www.trinityfi.org/press/donstewart.html
White House pulls plug on fundraiser’s ‘briefing’ Washington Times, 12:01 a.m., Friday, June 3, 2005 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/jun/3/20050603-120131-8586r/
Southwest Indian Foundation and Don Stewart Association
The Southwest Indian Foundation (a New Mexico-based Franciscan-affiliated charity) was a part of the Don Stewart Association's affiliated charities. The Southwest Indian Foundation had received federal grants from the Veterans Administration "to assist community-based agencies [to] acquire, renovate, or build transitional housing facilities, provide supportive services for homeless veterans and purchase vans for outreach to or transportation of homeless veterans." But there were concerns in how that federal money was spent. Southwest Indian Foundation in April 2005 was given a rating of “F” as a non-profit charity by the American Institute of Philanthropy because Southwest Indian Foundation did not directly benefit charity recipients adequately, because too much money was used for fundraising overhead and too little foractual charity work.
Southwest Indian Foundation 100 West Coal Avenue, Gallup, NM 87301
American Institute of Philanthropy Charity Rating Guide & Watchdog Report http://www.charitywatch.org/ratingguide.html American Institute of Philanthropy, P.O. Box 578460, Chicago, IL 60657 Phone: (773) 529-2300 Fax: (773) 529-0024 E-mail: www.charitywatch.org/
History of the Don Stewart Association
Don Stewart called evangelical preacher Rev. A.A. Allen his spiritual father. The ministry run by Don Stewart was originally called the Don Stewart Evangelistic Association But later it became the Don Stewart Association. It started originally in Phoenix Arizona by Evangelist A. A. Allen who wanted to build a Bible College on land that became known as Miracle Valley. Rev. Don Stewart took over the ministry following Brother Allen's death in 1970, when Allen drank himself to death at age 59. It was Stewart who attempted to clean up evidence of his mentor's alcoholic binge in a San Francisco hotel before the police arrived. Don Stewart gained possession of Allen's organization, including his Miracle Valley property, and renamed Allen's Miracle Life Fellowship International the Don Stewart Evangelistic Association (and later the Don Stewart Association).
But after Allen’s death Stewart was accused of embezzlement of the revivals offerings by Allen's brother-in-law. Stewart denied this and it was never proven. In 1995 the Latin District Council of Assemblies of God’s administration building built on the Miracle Valley property burned to the ground. The Assemblies wanted the insurance money from the fire to rebuild the building but Stewart wanted to keep the insurance money without rebuilding. Eventually Stewart sold the property to the Assemblies under the condition that it had to maintain a School there for twenty years or the property would revert to Don Stewart. For 20 years the Assemblies of God owned and operated Southern Arizona Bible College (SABC) at Miracle Valley, Arizona, closing in May of 1995. In 1997, the IRS accused Stewart of using his church for personal benefit and revoked the ministry's tax-exempt status. The Don Stewart Association was operating out of a nondescript warehouse but Stewart himself was living in $2.5 million Paradise Valley home owned by his church. In the 1980’s Stewart expanded his ministries going on an international crusade to 86 countries and drawing audiences of half a million or more in the Philippines, Central America and South America. He found a loyal following among African-American audiences. The charitable arm of Stewart’s ministry, Feed My People Children’s Charities, owned two of the largest food banks in Arizona: Northern Arizona Food Bank in Flagstaff and Borderland Food Bank in Nogales. Stewart founded Northern Arizona Food Bank in 1987 to serve Native American communities. Besides the food banks in Arizona, Feed My People’s Children’s Charities distributed food to facilities on the Mexican border and also in the Philippines.
Medical Whistleblower Advocacy Network
MEDICAL WHISTLEBLOWER ADVOCACY NETWORK
P.O. 42700
Washington, DC 20015
MedicalWhistleblowers (at) gmail.com
CONTACT
Educational Materials from Medical Whistleblower
Medical Whistleblower Canary Brochures
Advice to Medical Whistleblowers
Advice to Whistleblower Supporters
The Spiritual Side of Whistleblowing
Your Problem Solving Personality
PTSD - Emotional and Psychological Symptoms
Effects of Whistleblower Retaliation
Behind the Blue Line - Law Enforcement Whistleblowers
Medical Whistleblower Canary Notes
Bridging the Gap - Communicating Across Disciplines
Martin Luther King Jr. , Title 42 and 1983
White Collar Crime and Criminal Intelligence
United Nations Declaration of Human Rights
"Never impose on others what you would not choose for yourself." Confucius
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
Theodore
Roosevelt- Excerpt from the speech "Citizenship In A Republic",
delivered at the Sorbonne, in Paris, France on 23 April, 1910